Saturday, April 11, 2009

Travelogues



A miscellany held together by politicised journeys and travelogues of one sort or another:
I.T on a walk in London couple of days before the G20 farrago, through two lost worlds of British social democracy - the Barbican/Golden Lane, and the fragments of Lubetkin and Tecton's 'Finsbury Plan', isolated and embattled Constructivist experiments adrift in the media/property districts of Clerkenwell and Islington;
K-Punk on the right to the city, container ports, and Containerisation, a subject very close to my heart, as a lapsed Sotonian - a city which I've argued seems to have taken containerisation as the organising principle for an entirely new, if remarkably boring, form of urbanism. While Felixstowe or Tilbury's ports exist in isolation, the Southampton container port is central to a city (of a sort), and does very strange things to it. Am staying there for a few days from tomorrow, so there may be relevant dispatches from that godforsaken non-city, as the container port is walking distance from my Mum's - though you would hardly know it, but for the views of the cranes over the terraces. Much like the Suffolk port described here, it's a fascinatingly quiet place, where 'humans are invisible connectors between automated systems'. Also relevant to a forthcoming piece on English travelogues, which will also mention Andrew Cross' extraordinarily blank containerised English Journey, tracking one of them from Southampton to DIRFT to Manchester...more of which later.
Me in the NS on a travel book dedicated to Latin America and its pink tide. A badly written bit of exotica, yet worthwhile as a sustained discussion of one of the few places where 'we' are in the ascendant - mainly through a fearlessness about using state power, about nationalising things that make a profit as much as things that go bust, and a lack of compunction about using class and resentment as organising tactics.

5 Comments:

Anonymous Lang Rabbie said...

re: IT's photo-essay socialism and/or barbican

I know it is becoming increasingly difficult to find "proper" (architectural!) brutalism in the City of London outside the game reserve of the Barbican proper - cf my The Disappearing Highwalks of the City of London.

But for IT to describe the panels on Moorfields Highwalk above Moorgate station (Leo Hannen Associates???) as "clunky, but good" suggests a rather remarkable dropping of her usually impeccable critical standards.

This is a building that is ugly because it was designed by an incompetent architect to a low specification - not a building that is "ugly for its own sake".

The only good thing in its favour is that it isn't the bland Foster scheme for 21 Moorfields that was supposed to replace it by now.

8:32 pm  
Anonymous Lang Rabbie said...

Rant out of the way, can I just add that IT(?)'s reference to the hunt for Lenin's head as "an Easter Egg hunt for the terminally left-wing" led to me spluttering my tea across the room in mirth.

8:37 pm  
Blogger it said...

Ah, fair enough. It was less a well-informed architectural comment than a unreconstructed liking for those kinds of non-pattern patterns. Glad I made you laugh, though.

10:35 am  
Anonymous pressure vessels said...

just want to comment on the photo. I like the shot of the sky. Nice colors. You have a nice blog too. Very inspiring.

5:53 am  
Blogger owen hatherley said...

In its defence, the other good thing in the favour of that admittedly not good highwalk building is that the panels, when looked at with a sufficiently psychogeographic eye, resemble some strange kind of cuneiform, or mesoamerican script - and then one can ponder what message is being repeatedly communicated around the City of London via concrete panelling.

And thank you, pressure vessels, for saying nice things about that photo. Unlike practically every other good photo on this blog, I took it myself...

12:20 am  

Post a Comment

<< Home