Sunday, April 20, 2008

Underpass!



The Fantastic Journal, fairly fantastic, on the beauty and strangeness of the English Motorway System - and making the very apposite point that a motorway designed by anonymous concrete engineers will always be better than one designed by Santiago Calatrava. In fact there is one small stretch of English motorway that is 'designed' - on the edge of the M25, near Bluewater there's a section where the concrete is moulded to resemble Disneyland fibreglass, and given a (spit) friendly look. Nonetheless, there's nothing that can so slice a city into discrete parts, never to be joined together again, than a motorway - far, far more destructive of communities than the dark and reviled figure of the council estate designer, who did usually go hand in hand with them.



Although I almost admire the way that 60s planners could efface huge chunks of city to get these roads and conduits built - something utterly unimaginable today - I can think of two examples from places I've lived where a motorway or dual carriageway tears up urban fabric in a pretty grotesque fashion. In Southampton, the St Mary's area is sliced off from the city centre by a dual carriageway servicing the exodus from shopping mall to Hampshire suburb, instantly creating a ghetto; while where I live in SE London is sliced up by the Blackwall tunnel approach, ensuring, for instance, that the new enclave of Millennium Village is forever divorced from East Greenwich and Charlton, except via one footbridge which, despite a St Louis (or EUR) referencing arch, is designed in such a manner that you can never see if there's anyone in front of you - not terribly pleasant at 2am with only the looming skyscrapers of Canary Wharf, a silo or three and some cabs zooming past at 80mph for company. Similarly, the all but impassable road to Kent saves the inhabitants of Woolwich's Royal Arsenal colony from having to notice that they live in one of the biggest West African areas in London.



The element in the urban motorway that is perhaps most defensible is the one that is considered the most ugly - the flyover. The flyover not only provides the most sublime vistas and structures of the motorway - those monumental, thick legs upon which they lift themselves from the ground, the elevation and sense of the vertiginous on the way up - but in the way that, like a railway bridge, they actually add to the dynamism and excitement of urban life. Most obviously in the manner that the Westway left places like Ladbroke Grove intact by raising itself above them, enabling perhaps their eventual gentrification, but even the more prosaic Blackwall stretch suddenly achieves a poetry when it lifts itself from the ground, leaving the pedestrian to negotiate a series of columns and spaces that could become the venue for all kinds of extraordinary activity, if only it wasn't for all the sodding cars.

(Images taken from the J.G Ballard Flickr Pool...)

16 Comments:

Blogger Matthew said...

I'm part of a team of researchers within English Heritage working on the 'Car Project', a look at how the car has shaped the historic built environment, to use a potted phrase. It's fallen to me in particular to investigate motorways, and so I have to make sense of the service areas, bridges etc, placing them into some sort of taxonomic framework, but also look at the way in which these roads have affected town and countryside. In my experience so far, the example par excellence of a strangulating Mway is the Birmingham inner ring road, throttling its environs so successfully that one barely knows where the roadway ends and the city centre begins.

Bibliographic note: Peter Merriman, 'Driving Spaces: A Cultural-historical Geography of England's M1 Motorway', is a splendid move in the right direction for the study of these sorts of things, whilst David Lawrence, 'Always a Welcome: The Glove Compartment History of the Motorway Service Area' is a fun romp through the kitsch of the subject (overall message - the mainstream taste of the past was preferable to the mainstream taste of today)

8:40 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Although I almost admire the way that 60s planners could efface huge chunks of city to get these roads and conduits built - something utterly unimaginable today"

I wouldn't be so sure about, Owen. They're building another motorway through South-East Glasgow as I sit here and type.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/glasgow_and_west/7244627.stm

There are a couple of great photos of another, earlier and even more destructive phase of motorway building here:

http://www.bowlie.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1652038&highlight=charing+cross+mansions#post1651928

10:32 am  
Anonymous joe said...

Completely o/t but seeing as i read some interesting things on film here in the past maybe you would like to know, if you don't already, that Pedro Costa's latest film called 'Collosal Youth is playing in london this and next week http://www.institut-francais.org.uk/content/view/442/62/

6:40 pm  
Blogger owen hatherley said...

That's odd about Glasgow. The last major one over here was that Hackney one that elicited the Rachel Whiteread house cast, and that caused so much (justified) anger that there has been little of the like since. But what baffles me is - my street would once have carried on continuously to Charlton, and in the 60s it must have been proposed to flatten at least 100 houses and totally reconstruct the entire place, with a flyover dwarfing the rest of it. I mean, how? Were there protests? Did people accept because of the white-heat-of-technology and the fact they'd be able to drive easily to Kent? To make an unusual lapse into those horrid internet acronyms, WTF?

7:01 pm  
Anonymous Lang Rabbie said...

Sorry, but I think that's smacks of revisionist history, Owen.

The Kingsway dual carriageway cutting St Mary's off from Southamption city centre predates that city's adoption of mall culture by a long time (20 years?)

I think the "need" for it came from the move of port traffic from rail to road and the move to vehicles rather than foot passengers on the ferry routes.

There's an intriguing comparative research piece to be written [or more likely it has been written but I don't have access to an academic library to read it!] about how port cities across Europe largely destroyed their townscape from the 1950s to the 1980s at the behest of shipping interests trying to accommodate the move to the "great car culture". What is interesting in hindsight is the craven response of city administrations, backed by both labour and capital interests, desperate to ensure that they didn't lose trade to rival ports.

11:49 pm  
Anonymous Lang Rabbie said...

And another thing...

Fantastic journal sets up a false antithesis between "designer" Santiago Calatrava footbridges and those designed by municipal teams with a "lack of pretension".

On the strength of my annual vacation job as a blueprint printer with a County Council in the dying days of municipal glory in the mid-1980s - when they still had in-house design teams, and the Department for Transport trusted them to manage the Trunk Road network, rather than all projects being put out to design and build "procurement solutions" ....

I can assure you that in fact, there was deadly rivalry between the engineering and highways departments of County Council Engineering Departments, with a lot of effort devoted to "bravura" highway engineering projects, especially those with unfeasibly ambitious cantilevers.

The annual Concrete Society awards were taken very seriously by these people.

12:05 am  
Blogger owen hatherley said...

Glorious days...But the point at the F-J seemed less that engineers didn't care about the aesthetics of their structures, more that their aesthetics are different to that of eg Calatrava. Though maybe Calatrava himself as an engineer makes that rather more complicated - as would someone like Owen Williams (who did lots of the M1 as I recall) or Ove Arup...

I think the "need" for it came from the move of port traffic from rail to road and the move to vehicles rather than foot passengers on the ferry routes.

I'm sure you're right here, but I was thinking more of its current usage...also the key question here (as generally with the Beeching years) would be about the stupidity with hindsight of closing railway stations (like the old Soton Central by the bit of the docks that has since been closed and mall-ified) and merely shifting the traffic onto the roads, thus causing more damage to infrastructure than the railways had. It's not just the Kingsway dual carriageway, but the New Road (Thomas Lewis Way) built in the 80s which is similarly utterly obnoxious to the urban area around. My point is (one mostly of interest to current or ex-Sotonians!) - what if Kingsway was more like the Westway, rising up and allowing pedestrians through? Might it have been a bit less of a total divide..?

1:16 am  
Blogger Charles Holland said...

i'm reduced to commenting on other peoples comments to defend myself! oh the indignity! But,yes, i never said engineers didn't care about design. my point was that no one else seemed to care what it was that they were designing. very few works of public infrastructure - despite their size and ambition - are subject to the same kind of debate that buildings, even little ones, are. and this strikes me as odd, and slightly dangerous, in the sense that 'we' tend to not question where or why these things come from. there is a second issue which is that sometimes they are very beautiful as well as destructive.

11:24 am  
Blogger owen hatherley said...

I for one will gladly write flyover reviews for Blueprint.

So Lang, were you doing aforementioned vacation job in Southampton? My first girlfriend was the daughter of a Soton town planner, I always wondered if he'd been partly responsible for the Marlands but didn't have the temerity to ask

4:06 pm  
Anonymous Lang Rabbie said...

No, it was up in the east midlands.

I think the design for the Marlands got dumbed down when the recesssion hit and the city council was desperate for anyone to invest in the city centre, however ugly the building.

9:41 pm  
Blogger dinoibo said...

Sesli sohbet Sesli chat
Seslisohbet Seslichat
Sesli sohbet siteleri Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli Chat
Sohbet Sesli siteler
Sohbet siteleri Chat siteleri
Sohbet merkezi chat merkezi
Sesli merkezi sesli Sohbet merkezi
Sesli chat merkezi Sohbetmerkezi
Sesli Sohbet Sesli Chat
SesliSohbet Sesli chat siteleri
Sesli sohbet siteleri SesliChat
Sesli Sesli siteler
Seslimuhabbet sesli muhabbet
sesli sohbet sesli chat siteleri
sesli sohbet siteleri sesli chat
seslisohbet seslichat
seslikent sesli kent
sesli sohbet sesli sohbet siteleri
sesli chat sesli chat siteleri
seslisohbet seslichat

6:11 pm  
Blogger DiSCo said...

Really trustworthy blog. sesli Please keep updating with great posts like this one. sesli sohbet I have booked marked your site and am about to email it

to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading.. sesli chat

8:29 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here what i found -> vision correction

12:32 pm  
Anonymous negocios rentables said...

hello, i think that this post is the best that i have read.. i would like to read more about this topic.

8:13 pm  
Anonymous ideas de negocio said...

Really trustworthy blog. sesli Please keep updating with great posts like this one. sesli sohbet I have booked marked your site and am about to email it

5:31 pm  
Blogger ekle paylas said...

nice blog Thanks for sharing. voicesohbet was really very nice.
sesli chat siteleri sesli sohbet
sesli sohbet siteleri sesli chat
seslichat seslisohbet
sesli siteleri chat siteleri
sohbet siteleri sesli siteler
voice sohbet sesli sohbet siteleri
sesli sohbet seslisohbet
sohbet siteleri sesli chat siteleri
seslichat sesli chat
herkesburda herkes burda
sohbetmerkezi sohbetmerkezi

11:01 pm  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home